Sign our Petition!
Tell the U.S. Government to STOP treading on your right to access information to use natural cures!
| Why the FTC Attacked DC1 |
|
The FTC attack against DC1 in Jan. 2008 came about from a federal witchhunt. It followed on the heels of a complaint from the Competition Bureau of Canada. such government action and harsh judgement? Words like “helps to heal, prevent, treat”. One herb company was charged simply for having links on their website to government sites with information about herbs. About 120 supplement companies were netted during an internet search on the interent for specific words. Each was then systematically tyrannized and extorted. The words incurring Only DC1 refused to sign the FTC Order, refused to agree to the bogus Charges, and They physically removed several cans of Apple Pectin, and bottles of CoQ10 and 7Herb Formula from our shelves. As of March 2009, we have spent thousands of dollars to establish our rights and our in- nocence, and one month away from our first hearing the FTC sought to dismiss the hearing with a charge of “guilty,” seeking a new Charge and Order much like the original. Attorneys for DCO argue that the FTC is violating our religious freedom and have no jurisdiction over a non-profit ministry. April 21, 2009: The FTC Administrative Law Judge has decided upon an evidentiary hearing for jurisdiction on this day! The burden is now on the FTC to prove they have authority over DCO. The case must be dismissed if DCO is found to be a non-profit ministry. DC1 will submit 14 witnesses for the jurisdiction hearing who can testify that we are a ministry. If DC1 loses on jurisdiction, the next hearing commences April 23, and the FTC lawyers hope to block all our Witnesses from further proceedings. They regard the people who can testify to being cured of cancer and other diseases using DC1 products as “irrelevant”. The FTC have motioned to dismiss all DC1 expert witnesses also, five prominent scientists and doctors familiar with natural healing, who are prepared to testify that DC1 had substan- tive evidence for information we share regarding our products.
|








